USING THE LANGUAGE OF PHILOSOPHY
LANGUAGE OF PHILOSOPHY
A philosophical language is any created language that's
constructed from initial principles. It is considered a kind of designed
language. Philosophical languages were widespread in early modern times, partly
motivated by the goal of revising traditional language for philosophical
(scientific) functions.
Firstly, the communication seeks to higher perceive what
speakers and listeners do with language in communication, and the way it's used
socially. Specific interests include the topics of language learning, language
creation, and speech acts. Secondly, the question of however language relates
to the minds of each the speaker and also the interpreter is investigated. Of
specific interest is that the grounds for productive translation of words and
ideas into their equivalents in another language.
Argument
In philosophy, an argument could be a connected series of
statements, as well as a minimum of one premise, supposed to demonstrate that
another statement, the conclusion, is true. And also argument offers proof for
a claim, or conclusion.
Premise
A premise is a statement in an argument that gives reason or
support for the conclusion. There may be one or many premises in a very single
argument.
Conclusion
A conclusion is a statement that is inferred (reasoned) from
the argument’s premises & it indicates of what the arguer is trying to
convince the reader/listener. There can be only one conclusion for an argument.
Standard Form of Argument
The standard form of an argument
could be a method of presenting the argument that makes clear which statements
are premises, how many premises there are, and which statements is the
conclusion. In standard form, the conclusion of the argument is listed last.
Ex: (P1) I'm leave on this week.
(P2) I do not answer any
official phone calls on my leave.
(C) Therefore, I do not answer any official phone calls this week.
Language and
convention
It is necessary to understand
that language is conventional, it's also necessary to not misinterpret this
fact. From the concept that language is conventional, it's simple to conclude
that language is completely arbitrary. If language is completely arbitrary,
then it'd appear that it really doesn't matter that words we use or how we put
them together. If we wish to communicate with others, we must follow the system
of conventions that others use.
Speech Acts
In the philosophy of language
and linguistics, speech act is something expressed by an individual that does
not solely present information, however performs an action as well. Speech acts
serve their function once they're said or communicated. The simplest idea of this speech acts is doing something in using words.
These are commonly taken to
include acts such as apologizing, promising, ordering, answering, requesting,
complaining, etc.
Conversational Acts
That is, a situation where
various speakers use speech acts in order to bring about some effects in one
another. We’ll call this act of using a speech act to cause a typical impact in
another a conversational act.
Let's look at an example.
We can warn people about something in order to put them on guard concerning it.
Here warning is the speech act & put them on guard is a conversational act.
Conversational Rules
Conversations are often difficult social activities in need of rules to make them effective in achieving their goals. These rules have collected into four main groups.
- Quantity : Do not
provide less information than is required.
Do not provide more information than is required.
- Quality : Do not
say what you believe to be false.
Do not say something for which you lack evidence.
- Relevance : Make sure your contributions are relevant to the topic.
- Manner : Avoid
obscurity of expression.
Avoid ambiguity.
Be brief.
Be orderly.
Comments
Post a Comment